N. 62
Doctrine
(A) National
1. Arbitrating disputes between public servants and Public Entities under Brazilian Law
Laura Carneiro de Mello Senra ………………………………………………………………………………. 7
2. The need to prepare lawyers to advance mediation in Brazil
Leandro Rigueira Rennó Lima and Ana Luiza de Castro Viana ……………………………………… 30
3. Arbitration as an appropriate method of conflict resolution in agro-industrial contracts
Thiago Marinho Nunes……………………………………………………………………………………….. 58
(b) International
1. Brief comments on the new international commercial arbitration laws of Argentina and Uruguay
Julia Guimarães Rossetto and Luís Alberto Salton Peretti …………………………………………….. 80
Case law
(A) National State Commentary
1. Fraud and arbitration. Protest against sale of assets. Interest in acting. Acquisition of assets under judicial reorganization. São Paulo Court of Justice. 1st Chamber Reserved for Business Law. Civil Appeal No. 1008312-22.2017.8.26.0302. Judge Eduardo Azuma Nishi. J. 28.11.2018. Fraud against the enforcement proceeding and arbitration. Objection to the disposal of assets. Cause of action. Acquisition of assets during the judicial reorganization. São Paulo Court of Appeal. 1st Private Chamber of Corporate Law. Appeal nº 1008312-22.2017.8.26.0302. Reporting Justice: Eduardo Azuma Nishi. J. 28.11.2018.
Guilherme Enrique Malosso Quintana …………………………………………………………………. 101
2. Arbitration for the resolution of individual labor disputes. Commentary on the judgment handed down by the 5th Panel of the TST in RR 11289-92.2013.5.01.0042. Rel. Min. Breno Medeiros, J. 06.02.2019. Arbitration for the Settlement of Individual Labor Disputes. Comments to the Judgment of Appeal nº 11289-92.2013.5.01.0042, rendered on February 06, 2019 by 5th Chamber of Superior Labor Tribunal, Rapporteur Minister Breno Medeiros.
Fabiane Verçosa……………………………………………………………………………………………….. 122
(B) International State Commentary
1 Limit of the arbitrator’s jurisdiction. Jurisdiction-competence principle. American Federal Arbitration Act. Delegation clause. Totally unfounded claim exception. Not applicable. Literal interpretation of the contract. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 United States_,_, 139 Supreme Court 524. Threshhold Issue of Arbitrability. Competence-Competence Principle. Federal Arbitration Act. Delegation Clause. Wholly Groundless Exception. Not applicable. Interpretation of the Contract as Written. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc., 586 U.S. __, 139 S. Ct. 524.
Bruno Guandalini …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 160
General Information
1. Resolution No. 4/2018 of the Chamber of Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Ciesp/Fiesp ……………………………………………………………………………………………………….181
2. 1st Edition of the Ementary – Market Arbitration Chamber
Ana Carolina Weber …………………………………………………………………………………………. 186
3. Report on the 8th ICC Brazilian Arbitration Day – São Paulo, March 28, 2019
Rodrigo Moreira ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 190
Book Reviews
1. The Arbitrator’s Duty of Disclosure
Author: Ricardo Dalmaso Marques
Vitor Silveira Vieira ………………………………………………………………………………………….. 205
2. Treatise on Arbitration
Author: António Menezes Cordeiro
Arnaldo de Lima Borges Neto …………………………………………………………………………….. 210
Magazine of Magazines
1. Ana Paula Montans …………………………………………………………………………………………… 215
Editorial Line…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 224